<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The J/80</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:22:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>I think the J/24 vs. J/80 numbers aren&#039;t as different as they first appear although the two boats definitely feel different.  Both boats are very fun to sail.  The roughly 3100# all up J-24 weight should really be matched to the near 3300# for the J/80.  Also the J/80 doesn&#039;t sail with a 150% genoa making the SA 310 to 337 sq ft to displacement nearly identical.

The interesting thing that I&#039;m seeing in the polars is the how the J/24 supposedly can point higher than the J/80 and carry a little more speed.  Is this really true?

Finally, looking at the PY numbers, it looks like the J/80 is rated 9% faster than the J/24.

Would I rather have a J/80 over a J/24?  Probably.  Certainly a used J/80 is typically more expensive.  I guess it depends on whether or not I&#039;m racing on the sea in the Bristol Channel (Wales) or an inland lake in America.  One local J/80 on our lake is constantly catching floating weeds on the keel while the J/24 seems to more easily shed them.  I can tell you the fun factor on our local lake is still leaning to the J/24 due to the numbers.

For what it&#039;s worth... cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the J/24 vs. J/80 numbers aren&#8217;t as different as they first appear although the two boats definitely feel different.  Both boats are very fun to sail.  The roughly 3100# all up J-24 weight should really be matched to the near 3300# for the J/80.  Also the J/80 doesn&#8217;t sail with a 150% genoa making the SA 310 to 337 sq ft to displacement nearly identical.</p>
<p>The interesting thing that I&#8217;m seeing in the polars is the how the J/24 supposedly can point higher than the J/80 and carry a little more speed.  Is this really true?</p>
<p>Finally, looking at the PY numbers, it looks like the J/80 is rated 9% faster than the J/24.</p>
<p>Would I rather have a J/80 over a J/24?  Probably.  Certainly a used J/80 is typically more expensive.  I guess it depends on whether or not I&#8217;m racing on the sea in the Bristol Channel (Wales) or an inland lake in America.  One local J/80 on our lake is constantly catching floating weeds on the keel while the J/24 seems to more easily shed them.  I can tell you the fun factor on our local lake is still leaning to the J/24 due to the numbers.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth&#8230; cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I just checked at Seattle sailing, and they have 2 J80s and one J105 if you can pay $330/mo and $395 to join (or know somebody). They also have 4 J24s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked at Seattle sailing, and they have 2 J80s and one J105 if you can pay $330/mo and $395 to join (or know somebody). They also have 4 J24s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noj</title>
		<link>http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Noj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.j24blog.com/2007/10/14/the-j80/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>A lot of people have been drooling over the J/80 for years now. They really are fun boats, and the assymetric spin setup is awesome , I think specially because of the lighter winds we tend to get here.

The main problem seems to be the immense momentum behind the J/24 in Seattle and the market economics.  Not everyone can sell their J/24 at once, because the market would &quot;crash&quot; and no one will want to anyway because the J/80 fleet is so small.

I know the Seattle Sailing Club had at least one J/80 in the past years, so there&#039;s one you can take out and play with if you know anyone in Seattle Sailing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people have been drooling over the J/80 for years now. They really are fun boats, and the assymetric spin setup is awesome , I think specially because of the lighter winds we tend to get here.</p>
<p>The main problem seems to be the immense momentum behind the J/24 in Seattle and the market economics.  Not everyone can sell their J/24 at once, because the market would &#8220;crash&#8221; and no one will want to anyway because the J/80 fleet is so small.</p>
<p>I know the Seattle Sailing Club had at least one J/80 in the past years, so there&#8217;s one you can take out and play with if you know anyone in Seattle Sailing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
